
Smarter Housing, Stronger Cities: Infill Housing Explained


Infill redevelopment can raise a lot of questions—especially when a rezoning is involved. One of the most common shifts in Edmonton’s redeveloping neighbourhoods is from RS to RSM zoning. But what does that really mean for a site? For a block? For a community?
Here’s a closer look at the technical and policy differences between these zones, and why an RS to RSM rezoning might be proposed.
At first glance, RS and RSM zones might look similar. Both apply in low density residential areas. Both support housing forms like row houses. But there are important distinctions.
Since the RSM zone was created under Zoning Bylaw 20001, about 90% of RSM infill rezoning applications have been for RSM h12 rather than h14, which means that most people are looking for 12 metres of height, not 14 metres. Rezoning from RS to RSM h12 is a 1.5 metre difference—roughly the height of a tall garden trellis or a standard interior door turned on its side. In most cases, both zones produce 2–3 storey buildings, and the visual difference is minor.
It’s also worth noting that RSF—the suburban small-scale residential zone—also allows 12 metres, so RSM h12 height is consistent with zoning used in many parts of the city.
The extra 15% in RSM allows for:
In RS, density is calculated as:
Lot size in m² ÷ 75 = Maximum number of homes
For example, on a 525 m² lot: 525 ÷ 75 = 7 units max
In RSM: There is no fixed density cap; development is guided instead by height, setbacks, and site coverage.
This means designers can more easily explore building forms like:
RSF also has no density calculation—so this approach is already used in many of Edmonton’s new neighbourhoods.
There are several planning-based reasons why a landowner or builder might pursue this type of rezoning:
The result? Slightly more housing—with better use of the lot, more parking and backyard housing options, and forms that fit well in the surrounding context.
Rezoning isn’t arbitrary. Edmonton’s District Plans lay out clear criteria for when additional scale—like a shift from RS to RSM—may be considered. Nodes and corridors already allow for additional density, which we’ve discussed in a previous article.
Outside of nodes and corridors, rezonings for more intense small scale development are supported only on corner sites that meet at least one of the following:
These locations are specifically identified for modest growth that supports walkability, transit, and the long-term goals of the City Plan. RS to RSM rezonings are one tool to support that vision.
Even small changes can raise big questions. Here are some common concerns that come up with RS to RSM rezonings—and what the zoning actually allows:
RS to RSM rezonings are one of the most policy-aligned, design-sensitive ways Edmonton can grow. Here’s what they do:
When done well, this type of rezoning is a practical way to add much-needed homes while keeping the things people love about their neighbourhoods.
Whether you’re trying to figure out if your site meets the City’s policy criteria, or you want to know what RSM zoning could allow, Situate can help you make sense of it.
We’re here to help builders, developers, and landowners take smart steps toward thoughtful redevelopment in Edmonton.
This article was written by Situate, Edmonton’s planning consulting firm specializing in strategy and approvals for awesome infill and urban (re)development projects.
Our cities need more housing, and we don’t think anything should stand in the way. Book a call and let’s map the fastest path to yes.
